Bipartisan Policy Center – Nuclear Waste Policy Work Hub

YEAR
2026
SOURCE ORGANIZATION
DOCUMENT TYPE
GEOGRAPHY

Document Summary

This webpage is the homepage of the Bipartisan Policy Center (BPC), a Washington, D.C.–based nonprofit public policy think tank. Founded in 2007 by former U.S. political leaders from both parties, the organization conducts research and convenes discussions on issues like energy, healthcare, and national security.

The site serves as a hub for BPC’s reports, policy proposals, events, and expert analysis, many of which address complex national issues, including nuclear waste policy and “consent-based siting.”

This website and the organization behind it are not part of the federal government and do not create laws, regulations, or binding decisions. Instead, BPC operates as a policy advisory and research institution:

  • It produces policy reports and recommendations intended to influence Congress and federal agencies.
  • It brings together Democratic and Republican leaders to develop proposals that could be translated into legislation.
  • Its affiliated advocacy arm, BPC Action, works to advance those ideas into law through the legislative process.
  • Its publications often become part of the broader policy and administrative record, shaping debates, agency strategies, and, at times, court arguments.

While its work can be influential, it has no independent legal authority to approve projects or enforce rules.

WHY THIS MATTERS

The Bipartisan Policy Center’s work helps shape the policies that determine where nuclear waste goes-and who bears the risk. While framed as consensus-driven reform, many of these proposals rely on interim storage and loosely defined consent, raising concerns for communities like those in West Texas and southeastern New Mexico. Understanding these recommendations is critical because they often influence federal actions that move forward even when local opposition remains strong.

Key Excerpts

“A consent-based siting process is essential to building public trust in nuclear waste management.” – Page 1

“The current system for managing nuclear waste is fragmented and ineffective.” – Page 2

“Without a permanent repository, interim storage will continue to play a central role.” – Page 3

  • Unlock The Resource Document

    Invalid value

    Invalid value

CITATION

Bipartisan Policy Center. Nuclear Waste Policy Work Hub.

2021 TEXAS AQUIFER LONGEVITY STUDY
2021 TEXAS AQUIFER LONGEVITY STUDY
2021 TEXAS AQUIFER LONGEVITY STUDY
Container

PERMIAN BASIN STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AUDIT 2024

A comprehensive review of the legal arguments regarding the NRC’s authority to license private waste repositories.

DATE: OCT 12, 2024

WEST TEXAS WATER RIGHTS LITIGATION (CASE #402)

Initial petition regarding the allocation of subsurface mineral rights vs. groundwater preservation.

Related Resources

WEST TEXAS WATER RIGHTS LITIGATION

A comprehensive review of the legal arguments regarding the NRC’s authority to license private waste repositories.

WEST TEXAS WATER RIGHTS LITIGATION

A comprehensive review of the legal arguments regarding the NRC’s authority to license private waste repositories.

WEST TEXAS WATER RIGHTS LITIGATION

A comprehensive review of the legal arguments regarding the NRC’s authority to license private waste repositories.