The “Consent-Based Siting: Request for Information (RFI) Summary and Analysis” (September 2022) is a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) policy report summarizing public feedback on how the federal government should choose sites for interim storage of spent nuclear fuel. It compiles and analyzes over 200 responses submitted by states, tribes, local governments, industry, and members of the public in response to a 2021 DOE request for input.
The report does not propose a specific site. Instead, it captures public concerns, priorities, and recommendations about the “consent-based siting” approach, a policy idea that emphasizes voluntary community participation.
This document is not a law, regulation, or binding decision. It has no independent legal authority, but it plays an important role in shaping federal action:
It creates an official administrative record of public input, which DOE can rely on when developing policies or future siting decisions.
It informs how DOE interprets and uses its existing authority under federal law (such as the Nuclear Waste Policy Act) to pursue interim storage programs.
It helps guide future federal actions, including funding programs, policy frameworks, and potential site selection processes.
WHY THIS MATTERS
This report captures what communities across the country, including those in Texas and New Mexico, have already made clear: consent is not just a process; it is a question of power. For Protect the Basin, the concern is whether federal agencies will honor that distinction or use “consent-based siting” as a framework to advance predetermined outcomes. The report highlights deep skepticism about federal intentions and underscores the risks of moving forward without clear, enforceable protections for host communities.
Key Excerpts
“Many commenters emphasized that consent must be clearly defined, including who has the authority to provide it and whether it can be withdrawn.” – Page 6
“Commenters expressed concern that interim storage facilities could become permanent in the absence of a licensed repository.” – Page 9
“Trust in the federal government was identified as a significant barrier to successful consent-based siting.” – Page 12
“Transportation of spent nuclear fuel raised concerns about safety, infrastructure, and emergency preparedness.” – Page 15
Consent-Based Siting RFI Summary Report
YEAR
2026
SOURCE ORGANIZATION
U.S. Department of Energy
DOCUMENT TYPE
Public Comment
GEOGRAPHY
Document Summary
The “Consent-Based Siting: Request for Information (RFI) Summary and Analysis” (September 2022) is a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) policy report summarizing public feedback on how the federal government should choose sites for interim storage of spent nuclear fuel. It compiles and analyzes over 200 responses submitted by states, tribes, local governments, industry, and members of the public in response to a 2021 DOE request for input.
The report does not propose a specific site. Instead, it captures public concerns, priorities, and recommendations about the “consent-based siting” approach, a policy idea that emphasizes voluntary community participation.
This document is not a law, regulation, or binding decision. It has no independent legal authority, but it plays an important role in shaping federal action:
WHY THIS MATTERS
This report captures what communities across the country, including those in Texas and New Mexico, have already made clear: consent is not just a process; it is a question of power. For Protect the Basin, the concern is whether federal agencies will honor that distinction or use “consent-based siting” as a framework to advance predetermined outcomes. The report highlights deep skepticism about federal intentions and underscores the risks of moving forward without clear, enforceable protections for host communities.
Key Excerpts
“Many commenters emphasized that consent must be clearly defined, including who has the authority to provide it and whether it can be withdrawn.” – Page 6
“Commenters expressed concern that interim storage facilities could become permanent in the absence of a licensed repository.” – Page 9
“Trust in the federal government was identified as a significant barrier to successful consent-based siting.” – Page 12
“Transportation of spent nuclear fuel raised concerns about safety, infrastructure, and emergency preparedness.” – Page 15
CITATION
U.S. Department of Energy. (2022). Consent-Based Siting Request for Information Summary Report.
2021 TEXAS AQUIFER LONGEVITY STUDY
2021 TEXAS AQUIFER LONGEVITY STUDY
2021 TEXAS AQUIFER LONGEVITY STUDY
PERMIAN BASIN STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AUDIT 2024
A comprehensive review of the legal arguments regarding the NRC’s authority to license private waste repositories.
DATE: OCT 12, 2024
WEST TEXAS WATER RIGHTS LITIGATION (CASE #402)
Initial petition regarding the allocation of subsurface mineral rights vs. groundwater preservation.
Related Resources
WEST TEXAS WATER RIGHTS LITIGATION
A comprehensive review of the legal arguments regarding the NRC’s authority to license private waste repositories.
WEST TEXAS WATER RIGHTS LITIGATION
A comprehensive review of the legal arguments regarding the NRC’s authority to license private waste repositories.
WEST TEXAS WATER RIGHTS LITIGATION
A comprehensive review of the legal arguments regarding the NRC’s authority to license private waste repositories.
WEST TEXAS WATER RIGHTS LITIGATION (CASE #402)
A comprehensive review of the legal arguments regarding the NRC’s authority to license private waste repositories.
WEST TEXAS WATER RIGHTS LITIGATION (CASE #402)
A comprehensive review of the legal arguments regarding the NRC’s authority to license private waste repositories.
DATE: OCT 12, 2024
WEST TEXAS WATER RIGHTS LITIGATION (CASE #402)
A comprehensive review of the legal arguments regarding the NRC’s authority to license private waste repositories.
DATE: OCT 12, 2024